CORE ASSESSMENT
Core strength and core
stability are often used interchangeably; but the two are not the same as we
have seen in previous posts.
Whether the concern is
core strength or core stability, the question is how to measure it. Regardless
of the definition or location used to identify the core, it maintains the
stability of the spine in a neutral position during movement of the extremities.
Given the amount of research that has been completed on the core, there is no
standardized definition or means of assessment for the core.
Core assessment may
include measures of flexibility of the torso, functional balance, and various
forms of torso strength primarily to determine a link between the core and the
risk for injury, particularly to the low back. Because the core is responsible
for spine stability, testing of the core musculature must be done with caution
so as not to cause injury to the spine. Essentially there are three
variables that contribute to core stability: intra-abdominal
pressure, spinal
compressive forces, and hip and trunk muscle
stiffness.
Muscular core assessment
can be either static of dynamic. Static, or isometric, core
testing requires people to hold a position for a period of time with no
movement of the body. This form of assessment is simple to utilize and can be
completed by people of all fitness levels, but it is most suitable for those
who are less physically active. Dynamic core assessment requires
movement of the body and is most suitable for those at a higher level of
fitness and those implement or special equipment. Testing can be specific to
the sport or activity, although it is often complex.
We are going to focus on
functional core assessment. There are many tests to assess it. Keep in mind
these tests do not directly assess the core but speculate a strong or weak core
based on how well the participant completes the task.
The first is the Star
Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), which requires the layout of two sets
of lines on a floor. The first set of lines run perpendicular to each other.
The second set of lines run at 45-degree angles to the first set.
Participants stand on the dominant leg where both sets of lines intersect and
reach out in each direction with the non-dominant leg as far as possible
without touching the floor. The farthest distance reached with the toe in each
direction is recorded. This type of assessment is typically completed to
determine the effectiveness of a training protocol, rehabilitation, or
implement (e.g. ankle brace).
https://www.google.es/search?q=SEBT&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwits8vDyN3aAhVEVxQKHceCDCIQ_AUoAXoECAAQAw&biw=1920&bih=949#imgrc=ROTGuHZ9oGNVQM:
The second functional
core test is the single-leg squat test. Here subjects are required to perform
repeated partial squats to 45 degrees or 60 degrees of knee flexion. The
movement of the person is analyzed, particularly knee position (valgus or
knock-kneed and varus or bowlegged), using motion analysis. The knee should
track the foot. Any deviation suggests a problem with muscle activation and
force transfer through the core, possibly leading to future injury. Subjective
analysis can be completed if motion analysis equipment is not available.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxDbm7_CWec
All information was extracted from (Willardson
& National Strength & Conditioning Association (U.S.), 2014)
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Willardson, J. M., & National Strength & Conditioning Association
(U.S.). (2014). Developing the core.

Comentarios
Publicar un comentario